Monday, June 18, 2012

Book Commentary: Bel Canto by Ann Patchett, 2001

The other evening at dinner I tried to summarize and explicate Bel Canto.  My word, I found it difficult.  That is what happens with literature so abundant in meaning it resounds outward as if in waves, one after another, each coming from a deeper place in the well.  It’s been awhile since I read a book this good.  “Easier to write about….” I finally said to my friend.  Here I can put that statement to the test.

In an unknown South American country resembling Peru, a Vice President hosts an elaborate birthday party for a Japanese business magnate. The President stays home so as not to miss his soap opera, which adds an abiding question concerning the levels of political intrigue, since a trio of military generals stages a coup d’etat by taking all the elite persons at the birthday party hostage in the great house.  Sequestered there the group, consisting of the powerful elite and the armed rebels, is lulled over a period of several weeks into a rather relaxed state in which certain main characters fall in love and others abide or easily tolerate one another.  How ever does this happen?  Our weathy Japanese business man, who had no intention of building a factory in the godforsaken South American nation in the first place, had been lured to his birthday party by the presence of his favorite opera singer, so ardent was his love for this woman’s voice and interpretative genius, so fervent his love of opera, that which, in the end, he lived for after the long hours his work were daily done.

We spent the hours of the book in the house with the rebels and captives, a place that becomes somehow magical, a magic brought on by the universality of love and music that lifts people out of their conflict zones and mends societal fissures brought on by the tyranny of the wealthy over the poor and the inevitable suffering it causes.  Patchett brings both sides, oppressors and oppressed together in a rebellion of the latter against the former, in a social experiment of her own creation. 

She saturates her characters with the language of love and they prove worthy.  What would happen to people previously pitted against each other if societal inequalities and unjust constructs were removed, if living became immediate, if all that mattered were daily bread and music, nourishment for the body and for the soul, and the best of both were had in abundance?  This book is as much about the natural capacity for people of different languages, cultures, and classes to live together in peace if societal systems built for power and control over resources were removed, and the healing power of art were allowed to fill the void, as it is about the individual lives of Patchett's fascinating characters.

Unfortunately, and as Patchett knew, their story must end tragically, because a beautiful world suspended as it were in time and place cannot last forever except in imagination.  The hostages, who ironically have found more freedom held captive to the power of love and the beauty of art, than the world of men outside who are captive in a society built on baser instincts—the hostages will be “freed” though not all will emerge alive.  The Japanese magnate, who lived at the pinnacle of power due to his authority over accumulated wealth, will respond in a heartbeat to save the life of another whose life may not formerly have been considered to have much value, and in doing this he is redeemed, as if he had all along been a magnificent man who in a moment of truth proved this.

It is a brilliant enduring novel to continue to ponder, to write and talk about.